Thursday, March 26, 2009

What defines "expertise" in science teaching?

This is a question that I've been interested in for years, and is central to my current dissertation work (more on that later). Since I've built up a great PLN on twitter which includes many science teachers and science enthusiasts, I decided to pose the question to my tweeps. Here is a sample of their responses:

@gregorylouie said: @Bud_T Expertise ? Subject-Matter expertise + specific understanding of learning progressions based on research using developmental psych
@martywittrock said: @Bud_T A teacher that REALLY knows the subject matter but can explain it in common sense terms that a student can apply immediately
@mwacker said: @Bud_T Expert= experience, fresh ideas, and understanding of processes...what's your answer?
@wgraziadei said: @Bud_T expertise in sci: curious, visual, tactile, analytical, interactive, collaborative, reflective, professional practitioner/learner
@elizabethonline said: @Bud_T thorough interdisciplinary knowledge, know "why we care", excitement about the exciting stuff, and skills for remembering the tedium

Interesting ideas from folks: subject matter knowledge, understanding of student thinking, curiosity, experience, interactive nature, collaborative, reflective, communication skills, etc. I certainly can't disagree with any of these things, and I'm sure the list could go on and on.
But let me refine the question a bit for the purposes of the rest of this post: what knowledge do expert science teachers hold? I purposefully parse this from dispositions in order to try and bring the conversation into teacher education and to figure out what we, as science teacher educators, can teach in order to help prepare good beginning science teachers.
Certainly, knowledge of scientific subject matter is important. I don't think anyone would disagree with this. Two other things, which are at least hinted at in the above thoughts and are central to my dissertation work, are knowledge of specific student learning difficulties in the area being taught, and knowledge of appropriate representations of subject matter. When conceptualized within contextual knowledge, these two things along with subject matter knowledge form the essential components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK; Shulman, 1986). For a more detailed explanation of my interpretation of this model of science teacher knowledge, please see my research proposal (Talbot, 2008).
Now I'm not saying that these are unequivocally the most important knowledge domains for a science teacher to possess, though I do believe they are very important. Further, they are things we can teach prospective science teachers in our teacher education courses. Many of us already focus on these things through the teaching and inclusion of inquiry, assessment, knowing students, etc. But, can we fully articulate why these things are important? That's something I'm working on- the 30 second "elevator speech" as one of my advisers would call it. Can you (or I) convince someone of what a highly qualified science teacher must know? I think we (science teacher educators) should all be able to do this, and further I believe we should use our voices to inform and even influence policy. 
Please let me know what you think. As always, comments are welcomed.
New twitter responses since this was posted:
@BeckyFisher 73 said: @Bud_T I think understanding misconceptions and being able to unteach them is huge for a science teacher.
@chrisludwig said: @Bud_T A highly qualified science teacher must know how to tell good science from bad and be able to teach students to tell the difference
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Talbot, R. M. (2008). Measuring science teacher knowledge: Domain-general or domain-specific? (Research proposal). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado at Boulder.


  1. Interesting post. You have intrigued my mind (like a good science teacher would do). I would have also chosen areas such as the Subject, content and methodology of the subject for making a "good expert teacher in A field" .
    but your inquiry goes beyond that. i think then, it is the ability to adjust to what science is today or what science "holds" for the future. and to be able to expose the students to innovative technologies in the field of science.Preparing them to professions in science that do not currently exist.

  2. Ariellah-

    you make an excellent point about science teachers keeping abreast of and even predicting the future of science in order to prepare their students to be adaptive, lifelong learners.

    What I didn't go into in the post is the idea of adaptive expertise, which may capture some of this that you mentioned. The notion of being able to adapt your teaching and subject representations based on changing contextual factors is a hallmark of this expertise.

    Thank you for your comments and ideas.

  3. Whatever that knowledge is, that a good science teacher must have, it must be flexible enough to teach quantum physics to a kindergartener, and quirky enough to know how to be a kindergartener in a quantum physics class ...


  4. Marian- nicely put. I totally agree that flexibility is the key in many ways. In my further explication (research proposal linked above) flexibility is the main aspect of one dimension of this expertise. In our work, we operationalize it as "flexible application" of appropriate teaching strategies. This is modeled after the adaptive expertise idea from Hatano and Inagaki ("Two courses of expertise...").

    Thanks for your comments.

  5. Expert Science teachers have the ability to communicate complex subjects to their students in a manner that holds/rivets the students attention to fully absorb the information. The expert teacher delivers the information at the level that the audience, regardless of grade, understands and has the ability to connect to their students to ensure they're also understanding the topics without becoming lost.

  6. Marty-

    thanks for the comment. Great points about holding students' attention and communicating well.

  7. What defines "expertise" in science teaching? <-- that's what i was looking for
    Dissertation Writing

  8. I have been searching information by visiting several blogs and articles online. But this page has turned out to be the ultimate destination of my desired knowledge. This has no doubt really fulfilled my contention and for that I am thankful to the blogs owner! Regards

    Term Paper Topics | Term Paper Format | buy english term paper

  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

  10. Great stuff to have and Ill keep it

  11. Very informative and helpful. I was searching for this information but there are very limited resources. Thank you for providing this information
    Finance Dissertation

  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

  15. Thank you for sharing this information. The information was very helpful and saved a lot of my time.
    Dissertation Editing

    1. That's look great that people would love to share their educational matters and experience on internet, this would be good for readers who must face again this issues in their projects.
      Dissertation Help

  16. Different students search for the economics dissertation about this topic. When they know about your good enough knowledge, they would believably order the dissertation.
    Dissertation Help

  17. I would like to say that your article is awesome. You have good command on the topic. I will tell my friends about your website. Thanks for posting.
    zoology term paper

  18. you make an excellent point about science teachers keeping abreast of and even predicting the future of science in order to prepare their students to be adaptive, lifelong learners.

  19. Very informative and helpful. I was searching for this information but there are very limited resources.

  20. Information of specific student education difficulties in the area being qualified,

  21. I was checking continuously this blog and I'm impressed! Extremely useful information.

  22. I am very thankful to you for posting such stuff.This really help me lot.

  23. I would like to state something you've good way with words-at all. My partner and i take pleasure in work. Keep on publishing these kinds of articles. My goal is to save your internet site. Thank you for submitting.

  24. What defines "expertise" in science teaching? giving article details also nice It Company